You know what makes Jack Donaghy the best leader since the pharaohs? Brass balls.
You know what makes Jack Donaghy the best leader since the pharaohs? Brass balls.
Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: back in the day, entertainment, for sale, money, philosophy, video, youtube
Since Columbia has broken my spirit, I now laugh at the misfortunes of others. Thanks to Kristen for showing me this.
Can’t explain why, but I find this hilarious:
Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: comedy, history, humor, youtube
Yes, I know I promised a hiatus. But this will be short.
All of my Conceptual Foundations of International Politics lectures are being hosted on YouTube. Please enjoy for free the education that costs me a fortune.
It’s no Charlie Rose, and it can get a bit bland. But Khalidi is provocative. And he spit hot fire at the neo-cons when everyone else was buying what they were selling in 2003. The lecture is framed through “Alternative Views of American Primacy” and was accompanied by the reading of Khalidi’s book, “Resurrecting Empire,” which I highly recommend.
Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: dropping knowledge, education, history, iraq, professors, sipa, youtube
I don’t have a very refined taste in music. That is to say, I’m not, by any stretch of the imagination, a “music enthusiast” (a euphemistic term I created for my roommate Andrew because “hipster” chaffed him so much).
For that reason I don’t usually pontificate on my opinions of music. My reference knowledge is shallow, my history somewhat embarrassing, and my preferences extremely embarrassing (I had to clear my “most played” folder on iTunes to knock Kelly Clarkson from pole position… now it’s Too $hort, Andre Nickatina, and Mac Dre).
While I’m not an “early adopter” of music, and tend to stay within the realm of familiarity, I do take some pride in being able to recognize good, important music when I hear it. And Arcade Fire’s Neon Bible is good, important music.
I’m not necessarily new to the party about Arcade Fire… I’ve listened to them casually without being particularly cognizant of just how outrageously popular and successful they had become. They toured New York this past weekend and I was actually surprised to find some fairly yuppie people chattering on about how excited they were for a band I thought was popular only amongst Brits and indie-types.
Continuing on this “generational divide” bent I’ve been on of late, while we let ourselves be categorized as self-obsessed, self-entitled, narcissistic know-it-alls by our parents’ generation, it’s Arcade Fire that is resonating with us: collectivizing our frustrations, our cynicisms, our impotent despondencies in the face of hierarchical and bureaucratic authorities, our impatience and annoyance with assuming control from a generation that in many ways, has proven poor stewardship over the world we must inherit.
Listen to the words of Windowsill, and know our generation:
Don’t wanna give ‘em my name and address,
Don’t wanna see what happens next,
Don’t wanna live in my father’s house no more.
I don’t wanna live with my father’s debt,
You can’t forgive what you can’t forget,
I don’t wanna live in my father’s house no more.
Don’t wanna fight in a holy war,
Don’t want the salesmen knocking at my door,
I don’t wanna live in America no more.
‘Cause the tide is high,
and it’s rising still,
And I don’t wanna see it at my windowsill.
So, Tom Friedman… if one day you’re going to write about how your generation is passing the financial buck on the war it decided upon, and the next day you’re going to criticize American youth for not participating in public demonstrations of protest…. well perhaps you’re answering your own question.
Did I mention I no longer take him seriously?
Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: america, civil society, generational gap, hipsters, new york times, youtube
Yesterday we had a reception for incoming students (beer provided! Hooray for private schools!) and I signed up to be a contributing writer for The Morningside Post. (More to come on that front as it develops.)
I didn’t get a chance to meet with the student group that puts on an end of the year production called Follies, but given its snarky irreverancy targeted toward points of authority (see my latest post on financial aid), the group seems right up my alley. From Ivygate:
This time the story is set at Columbia University’s School of International and
Public Affairs, an institution that we imagine buys red tape by the mile. These
are students training to be parts of bureaucratic machinery. Navigating the
school’s rigid hierarchy, financial aid office, and shoddy advising system –
that’s just part of your education! At the very least, a few students saw enough
similarity between their school and the existential mudpit of The Office to
write and shoot their own remarkably faithful remake. It’s got the same
characters as the NBC version, only everyone is Columbia-fied: Michael Scott
burns time surfing J Date. Dwight denies students financial aid. The deans award
fellowships by picking out the cutest applicants’ photos and throwing darts at
the finalists to determine the winner. It’s worth a gander, but you’ll have to
fill out a permission request first.
This is fantastic! Al, clearly your advice to “be myself, but not FULLY myself” was misguided.
Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: columbia, financial aid, humor, sipa, snarky behavior, youtube
While filling out a security clearance for my previous job, I was required to complete a comprehensive list of all of my addresses of residence over the previous seven years of my life, for any stint over 4 weeks (note: this is something you should try for yourself sometime… it’s quite an interesting exercise).
By the time I had finished the form, I was shocked. During the seven year span, I had moved 15(!) times, living in 12 different residences, in 6 different cities — Irvine, Santa Ana (x4), LA (x5), DC (x2), Havana, and now, once again, NYC (x2). I had lived in a dirty tenement; an even dirtier co-op; on the floor of my friends’ apartment; a hotel; two dorms; four different apartments; and, during five excruciatingly painful episodes, at my parent’s house(s).
Looking back at all of those moving experiences– all of the boxes and bags I carried around; the sentimental trinkets I had unpacked onto my desks (only to repack months later); the layers of tape on the backs of the photos I stuck on the walls above my various beds (air mattresses included)– I recognized that, there were some goodbyes that were substantially more difficult for me to make than others, including my most recent goodbye to DC.
Now: as a child of divorce, I of course have my requisite attachment issues, and am no fan of goodbyes, in general. But the emotions I experienced when leaving DC were only comparable to three other experiences in my life:
1) Coming back from summer camp in Catalina (very first kiss!) to find out that my dad had got a new job in Orange County and that we were moving away from San Diego (my parents broke the news over dinner at Carl’s Jr. and I bawled like an abandoned bride on her wedding day);
2.) Saying goodbye, flight by flight, to all of the friends I had made in Cuba, as our planes departed from Cancun back to our respective corners of the US, (I was such an inconsolable wreck that I almost got detained in customs for getting smart with a border agent);
3.) Moving out of my apartment after senior year of college (playing foosball by myself in an empty apartment and weeping softly).
In between the frantic process of packing up all of my worldly belongings in DC and dumping them in some sketchy closet in Harlem, I had a serene 4-hour drive up the eastern sea-board in which to reflect on what made these particular goodbyes so much more painful than the others. (Note: This is where the post starts becoming relevant to YOU.)
The painful goodbyes are the goodbyes of liminality… the transitional state between two phases in our lives, the “in-betwixt and in-between” periods when we make our rites of passage metaphysically that are tangled and coupled with the actual physical moves themselves, compounding the associated emotions.
The liminal state is “characterized by ambiguity, openness, and indeterminacy. One’s sense of identity dissolves to some extent, bringing about disorientation. Liminality is a period of transition where normal limits to thought, self-understanding, and behavior are relaxed – a situation which can lead to new perspectives.”
During my housing search I liked to joke that I was homeless and unemployed, because I felt trapped in this liminal space between young professional and student, between DCist and New Yorker, between post-college and mid-twenties, between the things that could’ve been in my future had I not shifted my life’s rudder hard to the right, and the actual path that now lies ahead because I did.
The actual physical process of MOVING… of seeing my room completely empty, of saying goodbye to the people who had become my world over the last two years… is jarring enough in and of itself. But the self-realization of maturation that accompanies this move, of the opportunity costs of heading in a new and different (and presumably upward) direction, is pretty hard to swallow… especially when you’re driving in Delaware and “Good Riddance (Time of Your Life)” comes on the radio.
Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: about me, dc, goodbye, life, nyc, youtube
The following song should be sung to “Minimum Wage Nanny” from the Simpsons’ Mary Poppins spoof, which I couldn’t find online. So here’s some guy playing it (rather poorly, although I can’t hate) on his piano:
(Damn you youtube for failing me!)
[TUNER TO KEY OF C]
If you wish to be my room-mate,
I will ne-ver pay the rent late!
Fun-ny and kind with time to spare…
[Might I add: body hair!]
[piano twinkles]
So if you’re in Harlem, Upper West Side
Not too crazy and not too shy
I would be glad to join your mix…
[One small thing: No Fat Chicks.]
Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: humor, nyc, roommates, song, youtube
This isn’t a “walk into a bar” joke (I’m not sure how youtube could even walk into a bar. But I did watch a dog hump a duck on youtube yesterday. Duck was not loving it).
You know what I didn’t watch on youtube yesterday? The presidential debates. I didn’t watch them on CNN either.
Why wouldn’t I care to watch our likely next president engage in an unprecedented populist format of political discourse? Because it all seemed rather silly.
To me, the idea creates the false illusion that our country’s leaders actually care about/listen to the concerns of the unwashed masses. And it unnecessarily prolongs meaningless political debate and gum-flapping FAR before the election, while important national discussions of are being fillibustered back here in Washington.
Sure, maybe the format makes the issues more genuinely accessible, even if the candidates are falsely so. But still, the whole thing reeks of a boardroom decision made by some lame executive who saw Seth Grodin speak excitedly on something or another and took it to heart.
Now, I am on somewhat of a populist binge of late, so it may strike you as inconsistent that I would thumb my nose at something so democratic (or at least, on its face). But the range of issues, especially amongst Democrats, is so narrow. And all of the good ideas are being proposed by John Edwards, anyway (he’s angry, and he’s on your side).
I don’t want to be too dismissive here, because he really appeals to me— but how far can a former trial lawyer/hedge-funder who gets outrageously expensive haircuts carry that message?
The “Youtube as a populist outlet” debate– in the middle of a larger national debate on when/how/why we should withdraw out of Iraq– also reminded me of something Noam Chomsky mentioned in Manufacturing Consent, on the difficulties of selling the blue-collar class the necessities of war, mainly because they tend to be too emotive. Of the Vietnam War, he states:
One reason that propaganda often works better on the educated than on the
uneducated is that educated people read more, so they receive more propaganda.
Another is that they have jobs in management, media, and academia and therefore
work in some capacity as agents of the propaganda system–and they believe what
the system expects them to believe. By and large, they’re part of the privileged
elite, and share the interests and perceptions of those in power.
Now again, I like Edwards… but how is he the “populist” in the crowd? Doesn’t anyone remember Howard Dean?
In Chomsky’s terms, isn’t there anyone who will debate the war not on its strategic failures, but on its moral ones?
Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: chomsky, john edwards, presidential debate, youtube

I just got back from a weekend in New York, courtesy of the Chinatown-to-Chinatown Dragon Express bus. This bus smells like stale farts and duck. And I’m pretty sure it’s where the first case of SARS was discovered.
I don’t ever intend to turn this blog into some kind of lame live-journal, but there are just too many highlights to tell from the weekend. In no particular order:
Of course there were some other great minor events and our Saturday night dancing to the 80s.
It was just a fantastic weekend to be in the city (the weather was incredible) and I’m extra excited to be moving up there in a couple months. Anyone with a heads up on a place to live in mid-town/Upper West/Morningside/Harlem, drop me a line.
Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: about me, comedy, humor, new york city, sipa, youtube